Game Design, Programming and running a one-man games business…

Not enough web integration

The more I use the global hyperweb, and the more I rely on it, the less tolerant I become of everything that is *not* web-enabled. In fact the idea that anything I might own, invest in, or have a relationship with would not be accessible online or have an associated website is just infuriating.

We are now at the point where almost every business has a website. Even our local plumbers, or even butchers and bakers have a website. Admittidly, a lot of them suck, but the fact that they exist is better than nothing,

Hopefully, eventually things will go further. I might want a cup of tea in 5 minutes time, but I can’t turn the kettle on through the internet. I’m not sure if we have any cat food in the cupboard, and if there was a webcam in that cupboard, I could check that from here. On a cold icy day, it would make sense to turn the car on 5 minutes before leaving the house through a web interface.

Ok, so thats all a bit unlikely for now, but we live in a world where if you buy a new TV today, it will have a remote control that will control absolutely sod all else in your house. I have some software on my laptop that lets me share folders of pictures on the TV, but theres no easy way for me to adjust the tv volume or change channels from this laptop keyboard. This sucks.

Friends of mine who are a bit older, and dont use the web would consider all these ideas insane, and for the lazy, and totally uneccesary. And yet I remember my grandfathers black and white TV didn’t even have buttons for channels (you literally had to ‘tune-in’).

I reckon in 20 years time the idea that you couldn’t turn the cooker on or dim the lighting or lock the catflap from your laptop (or phone) will seem quaint. Whose with me?


8 thoughts on Not enough web integration

  1. “On a cold icy day, it would make sense to turn the car on 5 minutes before leaving the house through a web interface.”

    Great idea, except for having to explain to the mechanic, “No, no! It didn’t blow up because of a fuel injection problem, I said SQL injection!”

  2. The day that my kettle can be filled up and turned through the web, I will become highly concerned with my firewall being up to date… I do agree with the point that stuff that lives on my computer should be easy to access online. I love Gmail and Google Reader not so much because I like the interface, but mostly because it is online and correctly configured and ready to use wherever I happen to be. However, I like to have exclusive and un-hijackable control over stuff like my toaster oven or my car engine. Yes, I’d rather freeze for five minutes in my Canada-cold car. I’m old-school like that, I guess.

  3. I’m surprised that the HomePlug standards haven’t seen more consumer electronics IP enabled. I guess power consumption is an issue, and security relevant too, but everthing I would want to control needs to be plugged in. Why not HomePlug and UPNP enable it, then drop in a web server that exposes it’s useful functions. No need for clunky external X10 control units all over the place then.

  4. If everything was powered by your mobile phone, imagine having it stolen. that’d be a nightmare.

    One thing that I regularly wonder why it hasn’t been invented yet is the RFID powered front door?

    I mean, my car has keyless entry, why the hell doesn’t my house?

    Home automisation and futurisation is a big business, (and you can get coffee makers that fill and respond to wall mounted panels) – but until microsoft corner the market and integrate everything in some wonderous plug and play, I’ll just stick with doing it manually.

  5. Without doubt we are merging with our technology. Why are the BORG the enemies in Star Trek? WE are going to be the BORG. Fat and lazy cyborgs controlling their flushing with rasterized buttons…

    The “remote-car-turn-on” sounds good to me, nothing too BORGish here ;)

Comments are currently closed.