Game Design, Programming and running a one-man games business…

Financial research and AI

Yup, I’m still doing a lot of work on Ridiculous Space Battles, and recently did a new trailer and took new screenshots, and may even start running ads again… but in the meantime I do a lot of fussing about investments and finance…because I weirdly enjoy that sort of thing.

Somehow, I have ended up a sort of small hedge-fund manager. Its a very small hedge, but its my hedge, and I get to do what I want with it. I know a lot of people who did well from video games who then naturally use that money to make more games, or bigger games, or who publish a bunch of games by other developers. Actually for a while I did that, and published four games by other devs. Its a totally reasonably strategy. The video games business is so hit focused that to be honest the only approach that makes any sort of strategic financial sense is to go for the portfolio model, where you publish ten games and hope that the one hit pays for the nine flops (and this does seem to be the case). However, for me this approach has one huge enormous weakness (in fact two… but I’ll come back to that) – Its a lot of people management,.

I am terrible at dealing with people.

I am not whining about it. Everyone gets a random character-sheet at the start of life, and the attributes that got maxxed out for me have enabled very cool and lucrative career in IT and then video games. The flipside is that some of my attributes are very low and in need of buffs. But given we do not get to re-roll our dice on this, I am just trying to deal with the fact that I will never be someone with a big long list of employees or business partners. Thats never going to work out for me, or for them. I am not easy to deal with.

So here we are, with me managing investments in things instead of a larger games business. I still *make* games, but its just me, using stock bought art, or AI generated art, and even re-using music from a previous game. Its what maximises the fun for me, and minimises the stress. It does mean however, that I have a side-line in fussing with investing the money that my company made. And I did *try* to invest in in tangible things. I built a solar farm! (and may build another), but in the meantime I am invested in about 50 different companies/bonds/funds/trusts, and that takes a lot of time to manage.

I’ve made money, I’ve lost money, and everything inbetween. I made a killing on Tesla stock before he went mad, then a similar killing on Nvidia before Jensen started talking about spaceborne data-centers and financing their customers. I’ve had some big misses too. My bets on Chinese EV manufacturers ran into issues with a china price-war. I am still trying to wait that one out… But the reason I thought I would write about it is that I have used LLMs a LOT in deciding where and how to invest and it is AMAZING.

In a prior life, I worked for a company called Datastream/ICV, which was a stock market data IT company that provided research material and real time market information via satelite to stockbrokers and banks. It was really interesting. Because I tended to support the legacy datastream stuff, I went to a lot of the research offices for the big banks. These were not ‘wolf of wall street’ offices, but more boring, muc quieter rooms full of dozens of serious looking people reading financial reports, reading the news, reading in depth technical analysis… and then eventually preparing reports and summaries so that the actual traders could have some insight into if a company was over/under valued.

It was a lot of work, and clearly very important, and clearly had a good ROI.

And now its almost all irrelevant.

Talking to Claude/Mythos about financial stuff is a revelation. Its SO GOOD at this stuff. All the headlines focus on its unusually good cybersecurity capabilities, but I think thats just because it makes a scary headline. Hearing that 50,000 financial analysts may lose their jobs over the next year isn’t as sexy as Chinese Hackers blowing up the pentagon using their keyboards. I think anybody who has sat and had a long conversation with Claude about whether investment A is better than B, (and why, and what the potential risks were, and what dates to watch, and if your personal investment thesis on that stock holds up to scrutiny) will come away thinking ‘holy fuck this is good stuff’.

I know a TON of really skeptical people who think AI is useless. Almost always they have tried ChatGPT3 a few times, or read a free Gemini summary and think ‘they know all about it’. But a decent LLM is NOT a search engine. Its a research assistant. And when you treat it like that, its incredible. And sure, hallucinations are not solved, and AI can make mistakes. And Claude will make mistakes, but its still, in my experience, an order of magnitude better than any financial website / forum / discord that you can find.

Have you ever actually tried READING an article on Seeking Alpha or TipRanks? The web is not exactly filled with well argued deep impartial analysis on investment topics. Its a trainwreck of hype, clickbait and poorly-informed bullshit. And sure, if you read 25 articles about lithium prices, you *will* at the end of it have some proper understanding of whats going on, but you will wade trough so much nonsense to get there, that it makes perfect sense why the traders farmed all that out to the people in the research room.

Claude will do the same job, reading those 25 articles, searching for deeper context where those articles micht give conflicting data, search further on any topics raised by those articles, then compile it into a concise but pretty accurate report on the topic you asked about. Its especially good at answering the question “If I invest in this specific stock/fund, what am I really betting on here?”. Claude has convinced me to sell a bunch of investments I thought I understood well, but did not. Its recommendation have been extremely extremely good .

I am not a financial advisor, but I’m also not a guy trying to sell you anything. I’m just writing this to share my experience. If you have a pension, or savings and investments and feel unsure if you are invested in the right thing, then I strongly recommend just talking to a PAID premium SOTA LLM and asking it to push back on your choices. And yes, you can just say “DO not patronize me or tell me I am clever, give it to me straight” and they do. In fact I may have gone overboard with these instructions to Claude, which often says things like “Cliff, you are making the same strategic mistake here we have discussed many times before”. I find it kinda funny.

Anyway, give it a go. Its great at this stuff, and WAY better than that bloke in the pub who thinks he knows all about the markets. Even if that bloke is me :D.

Is AI capable of reversing social media’s attention destruction?

This evening I spent some time talking to the latest version of Claude about investment decisions, and the rationale behind various stock price movements. I also spent a bit of time browsing a bunch of of discord channels on servers I sometimes hang out on. I found the difference in information delivery to be extremely jarring.

I also, for some reason, occasionally spend time on the reddit ‘wallstbets’. It’s 95% bullshit, and 5% actual insight and analysis. As a result, I’m used to seeing a lot of typical 2026 one-liners, memes, in-jokes and random emojis and pop culture references, inter-spaersed with the odd bit of insightful financial analysis and modelling.

I do generally find most internet forums, reddits, social media threads and discords to be… kinda dumb and juvenile. Sometimes its what I want. An endless stream of star trek memes is exactly what I need sometimes, but in general I am more interested in in-depth analysis, and specifically, for analysis that presumes I am a) an adult and b) have an attention span. Any website that ‘warns’ me how many minutes it takes to read an article is an instant red flag for me. I am not a child, and am capable of sometimes reading entire books! Your article can be multiple pages. I will not expire out of frustration.

Enter AI

AI is perfect for me. I can ask claude a question about cocoa prices and it will respond with analysis. There will be no jokes, zingers, one-liners, memes or attempts to entertain me. If I then want information about the Strait of Hormuz and its impact on Korean financial firms, then it will provide me with detailed analysis of that too. If I want to dig deeper on the valuation model for specific Korean firms, it will do so. If I have supplementary questions about the leadership structure of that firm, it will research I and answer. If I ask for a comparison table of that firm with western firms in the same industry, or historical comparisons, it can do that too. In fact, if I want to spend the next 48 hours doing nothing but detailed research into the Korean banking industry, then Claude will provide, in as much depth as I can possibly stand.

The contrast with social media is staggering. On social media, you have maybe 128 characters to provide content. Thats trivial. On video sharing sites, you basically have a few seconds. It’s entertainment for the chronically distracted. A constant stream of unrelated trivial bullshit for people who have regressed to the point where even this paragraph would be considered an essay.

Until AI came along, I found the web just frustrating, distressing, pointless and deteriorating. It does not matter how many times you click on ‘show less of this’ on youtube shorts or facebook reels. Your opinion is not important. The social media giants have decreed that all media is SHORT, and if your attention span is longer than ‘BLAM’, then you are obviously a freak and your opinion does not count.

But now, people who actually want to read, or research have a new best friend. LLMs have no adverts (yet), no distractions, no memes, no emojis, no jokes, no one-liners, no clickbait headlines, no bullshit. It’s like wikipedia in human form. You can become as informed as you like, on any topic, in huge depth, any time, for a trivial subscription cost.

When I talk to Claude about investing, it’s MASSIVELY better than reading ANY financial news or analysis sites. Even the premium ones you pay subscriptions for. I ignore absolutely all ‘news’ articles about stocks, and go straight to Claude. I can actually ask questions and seek clarifications, and I get them, without a shit-ton of ‘editorial opinion’ or sponsored links. Its amazing. And as a result, my effectiveness as an investor is way higher.

Duplicate this to absolutely any field. You have people who it seems to me have just frankly ‘given up’ and regressed into the child-like dopamine hits of nothing but social media doom-scrolling (or happy-scrolling, just ingesting a thousand feel-good videos of cute animals is equally brain-rotting), and you have other people who are able to reject that and dig deep into whatever it is they want to know about.

We seem to be becoming a society straight out of science fiction, split into factions. Some people are leveraging AI to become hyper-informed and hyper-aware. Others are stuck on social media become hyper-desensitized and hyper-distracted. Essentially we have one technology that makes people super productive, and another making them super-useless. In some cases, the same companies provide both services.

Social Media, in it’s currently ‘blipvert’ form, feels to me like a damaging disease. It’s handing out tiny droplets of dopamine in return for selling us stuff and pretending its free. But the side-effect of this is an entire generation of people with a crumbling attention span, and frankly what also appears to be crumbling IQs. I firmly believe we need hard limits on social media. The ‘endless scrolling’ mechanic is like a marketing nuclear weapon, and the privacy destroying algorithms happy to feed us endless bullshit as long as we just click-click-click until we pass out make it worse. It’s insane we let this happen. There is an alternate universe where we went direct from wikipedia to modern LLMs, without all the hate-speech-disinformation-timewasting-bullshit that is twitter and instagram. A direct line from widespread information availability to a supercharged interactive teacher.

Granted, AI can make mistakes. Hallucinations are a thing (although in my experience, way less common in premium models), but anybody who thinks the content available in general on social media and the many news websites can be entirely relied upon is deluding themselves. I personally find AI to provide way more accurate information than reddit, social media, or any news site.

I massively support efforts in the EU to force social media algorithms to change. We have an opportunity here to ‘reset’ online life so it makes us smarter, not more stupid. Lets seize it. And lets also be more willing to embrace the positives of AI. All I ever hear is the negatives, but for people who are genuinely curious about the world, AI has the potential to be an expert teacher and research team on every topic, for everyone. That sounds awesome to me.

Posted in AI Tagged